En artikel om et par usædvanligt grove overfald i Sverige førte mig på sporet af endnu en fascistisk dansk hjemmeside. Her gribes der med arme og ben og ganske ukritisk efter alle de halmstrå af større eller mindre signifikans, som måtte understøtte den fælles patriotiske sag. Humoren bliver således storslået, når man ser fascister misbruge Orwell, fordi de tror, at han var antisocialist.

Citat: »På ethvert givet tidspunkt findes der en ortodoksi, et sæt ideer, som man antager, at alle rettænkende mennesker accepterer uden at stille spørgsmål. Det er ikke direkte forbudt at sige dette eller hint, men det er ikke noget "man gør"..... Enhver, som udfordrer den herskende ortodoksi, opdager, at han bringes til tavshed med forbavsende effektivitet. En mening, der virkelig går på tværs af, hvad der er moderne, får næsten aldrig en fair behandling, hverken i den populære presse eller i de intellektuelle tidskrifter« (George Orwell).
http://www.patriot.dk/

Jeg håber da, at Ole Kreiberg vel er klar over, at George Orwell var glødende socialist og at tanken om at blive misbrugt til at sprede nationalistisk højrefløjspropaganda med garanti har ligget ham meget fjernt. Ellers må han nok se at få skolepengene tilbage. Det kan jo undre, at man på samme side som Orwell-citatet kan finde artikler af Bering, som hader socialister. Hvis nu man tager et kig på Mussolinis fascistiske manifest, så vil man se, at fascismen pr. definition er højreorienteret. Stalin og den praktiske udfoldelse af kommunismen var intet andet end det, som Orwell så glimrende beskrev - en socialistisk grundtanke, som i praksis udviklede sig til rendyrket højreorienteret fascisme.

Læs om Orwell her: http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell

Læs om fascisme fra koens egen røv her: http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

Et par guldkorn fra Mussolini:

»Fascism wants man to be active and to engage in action with all his energies...«
(De skal bare ud og arbejde, så bliver de glade og lykkelige...)

»...life, as conceived of by the Fascist, is serious, austere, and religious; all its manifestations are poised in a world sustained by moral forces and subject to spiritual responsibilities. The Fascist disdains an “easy" life...«
(Jeg troede, at en meningsfuld tilværelse var at foretrække... FUCK!! Jeg tog fejl!)

»The Fascist conception of life is a religious one, in which man is viewed in his immanent relation to a higher law, endowed with an objective will transcending the in­dividual and raising him to conscious membership of a spiritual society.«
(Jaeh, fy for satan!)

»Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity (11). It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts.«
(skal man grine eller græde?)

»Fascism believes now and always in sanctity and heroism, that is to say in acts in which no economic motive - remote or immediate - is at work. Having denied historic materialism, which sees in men mere puppets on the surface of history, appearing and disappearing on the crest of the waves while in the depths the real directing forces move and work, Fascism also denies the immutable and irreparable character of the class struggle which is the natural outcome of this economic conception of history; above all it denies that the class struggle is the preponderating agent in social transformations. Having thus struck a blow at socialism in the two main points of its doctrine, all that remains of it is the sentimental aspiration-old as humanity itself-toward social relations in which the sufferings and sorrows of the humbler folk will be alleviated. But here again Fascism rejects the economic interpretation of felicity as something to be secured socialistically, almost automatically, at a given stage of economic evolution when all will be assured a maximum of material comfort. Fascism denies the materialistic conception of happiness as a possibility, and abandons it to the economists of the mid-eighteenth century. This means that Fascism denies the equation: well-being = happiness, which sees in men mere animals, content when they can feed and fatten, thus reducing them to a vegetative existence pure and simple.«
(Et opgør med både liberalismen og socialismen på én og samme tid).

»Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and the economic sphere.«

»In rejecting democracy Fascism rejects the absurd conventional lie of political equalitarianism, the habit of collective irresponsibility, the myth of felicity and indefinite progress.«
(Jah, den hører vi tit nu for tiden. Opgøret med ligeværdighed er senest præsenteret her: http://blog.tv2.dk/ateo/entry262573.html).

»In one of his philosophic Meditations Renan - who had prefascist intuitions remarks, "Reason and science are the products of mankind, but it is chimerical to seek reason directly for the people and through the people. It is not essential to the existence of reason that all should be familiar with it; and even if all had to be initiated, this could not be achieved through democracy which seems fated to lead to the extinction of all arduous forms of culture and all highest forms of learning. The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature's plans, which care only for the species and seem ready to sacrifice the individual. It is much to be feared that the last word of democracy thus understood (and let me hasten to add that it is susceptible of a different interpretation) would be a form of society in which a degenerate mass would have no thought beyond that of enjoying the ignoble pleasures of the vulgar ".«

(Gamle dyder).

»The liberal century, after piling up innumerable Gordian Knots, tried to cut them with the sword of the world war. Never has any religion claimed so cruel a sacrifice. Were the Gods of liberalism thirsting for blood? Now liberalism is preparing to close the doors of its temples, deserted by the peoples who feel that the agnosticism it professed in the sphere of economics and the indifferentism of which it has given proof in the sphere of politics and morals, would lead the world to ruin in the future as they have done in the past. This explains why all the political experiments of our day are anti-liberal, and it is supremely ridiculous to endeavor on this account to put them outside the pale of history, as though history were a preserve set aside for liberalism and its adepts; as though liberalism were the last word in civilization beyond which no one can go.«
(Ja, Vor Herre bevar os vel - og hvis ikke ham, så vatikanet).

»It is Fascism which has refashioned the character of the Italians, removing impurity from our souls, tempering us to all sacrifices, restoring the true aspect of strength and beauty to our Italian face. (Speech delivered at Pisa , May 25, 1926 , in Discorsi del  1926, Milano, Alpes, 1927, p. 193).«

(Denne optagethed af renselse minder lidt om en videreudvikling af aber, som sidder og piller lus af hinanden. Set i en historisk kontekst var det nok et fejltrin af aberne at begynde at kaste bomber efter hinanden).

»If liberalism spells individualism, Fascism spells government.«

»The Fascist State is not indifferent to religious phenomena in general nor does it maintain an attitude of indif­ference to Roman Catholicism, the special, positive religion of Italians. The State has not got a theology but it has a moral code. The Fascist State sees in religion one of the deepest of spiritual manifestations and for this reason it not only respects religion but defends and protects it. The Fascist State does not attempt, as did Robespierre at the height of the revolutionary delirium of the Convention, to set up a "god” of its own; nor does it vainly seek, as does Bolshevism, to efface God from the soul of man. Fascism respects the God of ascetics, saints, and heroes, and it also respects God as conceived by the ingenuous and primitive heart of the people, the God to whom their prayers are raised.«

Folk er velkomne til at finde flere lighedspunkter med den af regeringen og Dansk Folkeparti førte politik. Denne tekst vil blive opdateret løbende. For en psykologisk indgangsvinkel til stoffet, læs her: http://blog-dyn.tv2.dk/snowtiger/entry173239.html